gapala
03-14 01:03 PM
Great video Maddipati. This guy is brilliant and thought provoking. His explanation of international money market and globalization is very easy to comprehend. I doubt deeply involved Bernankie can explain with such details to laymen. :)
I have to confess that he is absolutely right about spending when one is single vs. married. I am sure lot of us have gone through this :D:D
Below is another video in length. Watch the entire movie and deliberate before commenting.
"Can you imagine, People even believed that they don't have to worry about paying their mortgage" :) :D
Lets have a civic discussion.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7886780711843120756&ei=4t67SfWGFpGsrQKvpZgS&q=obama+deception&hl=en
I have to confess that he is absolutely right about spending when one is single vs. married. I am sure lot of us have gone through this :D:D
Below is another video in length. Watch the entire movie and deliberate before commenting.
"Can you imagine, People even believed that they don't have to worry about paying their mortgage" :) :D
Lets have a civic discussion.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7886780711843120756&ei=4t67SfWGFpGsrQKvpZgS&q=obama+deception&hl=en
wallpaper rihanna loud album art_10. Tribal Art Tattoo 13 ebook Cd
ho jayega
12-27 06:18 PM
Guy,
I would first like to thank to all of you who are here to help each other and what a great effort IV is doing.
In my previous post http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=15889
I have requested for help in regards with how to address the ability to pay denial . I have recieved a lot of help for various members and also talking with attorney, here is what we are planning to do as far as the appeal is concern.
1 - Since my company was not paying the proffered wages from the year 2003 to 2006 ( in 2007 they are), my company is agreed to pay me the difference of the salary from the year 2003 in check and will right a statement as to why I didnt get the fully salary before.
2 - Company will provide the last 2-3 months of payroll statement which is more that a milliion dollar.
3 - An audited financial statement of 2007
4- My recent pay stubs
5 - My W2 from 2003-2006
6- Recommendation letter from the federal client where I am currently working, showing that how important services the company is providing at the federal agency and since I am the project manager.
This is the list of documents that we have come up with to apply for an appeal. IN the mean time I am also filing a new labor with another company under PERM. Since my h1b is expiring in June 2008, if the I-140 get approve during the MTR and doesnt go to appeal stage I will be set, else if it goes to appeal then I am planning to extend the H1 based on appeal and will transfer my h1 to the company where they are filing a new labor for me and file 1-140 from there hence starting from square one again.
I do want an advise from all of you if I am missing something that should file with the MTR/appeal. Any suggestion to improve my MTR/appeal filing is appriciated.
Thanks
RB
Hello Rbashir
your case is same as mine, i got denial due to A2P, filed MTR on Oct 22
however my employer didnt transfer any funds for the difference in salary from 2002 till 2004 , however they did send audited financials + letter from CPA and CFO.
let me know once you get a response on ur MTR
my personal id is gune01@gmail.com
I would first like to thank to all of you who are here to help each other and what a great effort IV is doing.
In my previous post http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=15889
I have requested for help in regards with how to address the ability to pay denial . I have recieved a lot of help for various members and also talking with attorney, here is what we are planning to do as far as the appeal is concern.
1 - Since my company was not paying the proffered wages from the year 2003 to 2006 ( in 2007 they are), my company is agreed to pay me the difference of the salary from the year 2003 in check and will right a statement as to why I didnt get the fully salary before.
2 - Company will provide the last 2-3 months of payroll statement which is more that a milliion dollar.
3 - An audited financial statement of 2007
4- My recent pay stubs
5 - My W2 from 2003-2006
6- Recommendation letter from the federal client where I am currently working, showing that how important services the company is providing at the federal agency and since I am the project manager.
This is the list of documents that we have come up with to apply for an appeal. IN the mean time I am also filing a new labor with another company under PERM. Since my h1b is expiring in June 2008, if the I-140 get approve during the MTR and doesnt go to appeal stage I will be set, else if it goes to appeal then I am planning to extend the H1 based on appeal and will transfer my h1 to the company where they are filing a new labor for me and file 1-140 from there hence starting from square one again.
I do want an advise from all of you if I am missing something that should file with the MTR/appeal. Any suggestion to improve my MTR/appeal filing is appriciated.
Thanks
RB
Hello Rbashir
your case is same as mine, i got denial due to A2P, filed MTR on Oct 22
however my employer didnt transfer any funds for the difference in salary from 2002 till 2004 , however they did send audited financials + letter from CPA and CFO.
let me know once you get a response on ur MTR
my personal id is gune01@gmail.com
Vexir
05-16 11:44 PM
Hm, I see my sophisticated, light-hearted wit has won you over =)
2011 by Rihanna featuring Drake.
mariofan
12-04 05:07 PM
yeah!!! that was so cool!
:mario: mariofan
:mario: mariofan
more...
ThankyouIV
12-13 08:21 PM
Dear IV,
I'm sure you will help me on this one. I've to be patience , as it's a weekend.
It's a like sick feeling, in other words feeling like escaping from regular human life....I had enough is enough, going through, lay-offs, health issues and what not....I don't want anyone to go through this.
Have a good weekend guys!
I'm sure you will help me on this one. I've to be patience , as it's a weekend.
It's a like sick feeling, in other words feeling like escaping from regular human life....I had enough is enough, going through, lay-offs, health issues and what not....I don't want anyone to go through this.
Have a good weekend guys!
desi485
08-19 04:57 PM
Though it is bit scary, whoever invokes AC21 must prepare to submit all the documentation when needed.
As per the information in the below article, make sure you all have the follwoing documents for future RFEs. I am just putting my thoughts/assumptions for what probable reasons the below documets may needed.
1) Updated G-325A:USCIS uses this information to check the background check.
2) All the W-2s: I strongly suggest to keep all of them as these are the only documents that matches the salary that your employer mentioned in the labor when they filed the Labor.
3) Paycheck copies: I assume, the paychecks are for proof for 180day ruls of Ac 21. You can say to USCIS that you have stayed with your sponsoring employer for 180 days. You can provide the paystubs for the period and support these 180 day rule.
4) Details of the new job including specific job title: As this is mandatory to interfile AC21. This will fall under "Same/Similar" clause of Ac21.
5) Educational/Experience requirement: Not sure why???? any thoughts??
6) Wages: as this varies from region to region, a significant difference may cause some problems. However, as per the previous postings it has got very minimal effect.
Friends pls share your thoughts for each category, that will be useful for many people.
Thanks
Raghav235
Raghav, it seems that ppl are bz checking LUDs. No one is paying any attentions to such an important thread. I opened a thread yesterday about CIS not publishing the processing dates, and instead got many 'RED' dots from the LUD checkers. :-)
As per the information in the below article, make sure you all have the follwoing documents for future RFEs. I am just putting my thoughts/assumptions for what probable reasons the below documets may needed.
1) Updated G-325A:USCIS uses this information to check the background check.
2) All the W-2s: I strongly suggest to keep all of them as these are the only documents that matches the salary that your employer mentioned in the labor when they filed the Labor.
3) Paycheck copies: I assume, the paychecks are for proof for 180day ruls of Ac 21. You can say to USCIS that you have stayed with your sponsoring employer for 180 days. You can provide the paystubs for the period and support these 180 day rule.
4) Details of the new job including specific job title: As this is mandatory to interfile AC21. This will fall under "Same/Similar" clause of Ac21.
5) Educational/Experience requirement: Not sure why???? any thoughts??
6) Wages: as this varies from region to region, a significant difference may cause some problems. However, as per the previous postings it has got very minimal effect.
Friends pls share your thoughts for each category, that will be useful for many people.
Thanks
Raghav235
Raghav, it seems that ppl are bz checking LUDs. No one is paying any attentions to such an important thread. I opened a thread yesterday about CIS not publishing the processing dates, and instead got many 'RED' dots from the LUD checkers. :-)
more...
ricky26
12-19 10:06 AM
Obama is using "trial and error" technique, do not have real political game playing experience. He is learning on the job. Empty rhetoric. Some may work, surely not all.
2010 rihanna loud album art_10.
breddy2000
10-09 11:03 PM
This really makes us think as to why we are in this situation and why it has always been this way. Its above and beyond our current imagination
Very Thought provoking. Wud love to put this as a seperate thread, but do not see any link for creating a new thread.
Zeitgeist: Addendum
===============http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7065205277695921912
A lengthy video , but worth watching...
Very Thought provoking. Wud love to put this as a seperate thread, but do not see any link for creating a new thread.
Zeitgeist: Addendum
===============http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7065205277695921912
A lengthy video , but worth watching...
more...
hibhagya
07-05 06:33 PM
They may just want to give them some important message... I think this is something internal and not applicable to general 485 filers.
if anybody is oh law firm client please clarify.
I guess they may be asking people whether to file the paper work or not.
It seems like USCIS is holding on to the file untill the matter is resolved.
I am not one of their client,I am just guessing the info
if anybody is oh law firm client please clarify.
I guess they may be asking people whether to file the paper work or not.
It seems like USCIS is holding on to the file untill the matter is resolved.
I am not one of their client,I am just guessing the info
hair rihanna loud album art_10.
b.rich
06-05 05:50 PM
hey... im send you a link via email to the psd. just waiting on the upload.... 25%....
more...
pd_recapturing
09-12 08:05 PM
Yes, thats exactly what happened .. my lawyer insisted me to go with eb2 140 while applying 485 but I asked him to use the approved eb3 140 .. that was the blunder i did .. Actually, I dint want to take the risk as I thot, if eb2 dont get approved due to somereason, I will be in soup ..
hot rihanna loud album art_10. one dollar bill clip art. 10
vgayalu
02-09 01:11 PM
These are unbelieveble.
They can sell GCS for 10 K instead of raising like this.
Form Petition Type Current Fee Proposed Fee
I-129 Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker $ 190 $ 320
I-130 Petition for Alien Relative $ 190 $ 355
I-485 Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status $ 325 $ 905
I-140 Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker $ 195 $ 475
N-400 Application for Naturalization $ 330 $ 595
They can sell GCS for 10 K instead of raising like this.
Form Petition Type Current Fee Proposed Fee
I-129 Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker $ 190 $ 320
I-130 Petition for Alien Relative $ 190 $ 355
I-485 Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status $ 325 $ 905
I-140 Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker $ 195 $ 475
N-400 Application for Naturalization $ 330 $ 595
more...
house rihanna cd 2011. black women 2011 pictures. black women 2011 pictures.
Pineapple
07-27 02:55 AM
I had the same issue, when my lawyers sent my package early in July. I had sent it by Fex Ex, and though it reached the nearest distribution place the next day, it took an additional day before it was signed for.
The reason is most likely a backlog in the mail room at USCIS. Wait for a couple of business days and it will be received.
The reason is most likely a backlog in the mail room at USCIS. Wait for a couple of business days and it will be received.
tattoo loud album cover. rihanna loud
neoklaus
02-03 09:23 AM
I have a tax-based proposal in order to:
1) Remove per country quotas on EB immigration
2) Increase the current 140,000 limit on EB green cards
I'd like it if the Core Leadership team of IV looked at this proposal and considered it as a tool towards achieving our other platform issues.
1) There are about 500K individuals on probationary status, with an average salary of $75K and a total of $37.5B.
2) Tax these individuals an extra 3% to the income tax and let those funds be solely reserved for a public insurance health program for underinsured American citizens (a la the Obama Health plan). 3% of $37.5B is still a sizable $1.125B, considering that Obama's Health plan calls for investing $10B.
3) Even after receiving the Green Card, this tax applies, until the person obtains US citizenship.
4) In exchange for 3% extra of our earnings, US lawmakers must abolish per country caps, as well as increase the 140K quota to 300K.
Pros:
1) Americans view everything and everyone as a business. As soon as they see that this proposal benefits them, they will be more amenable to legal immigration
2) This is the best bet for removing per country quotas - when you show them the dollar value of doing so - individuals from India and China who get their GCs can soon move onto bigger and better paying jobs, and pay more of this 3% tax
3) Green card backlogs will tremendously reduce (since most of it was created because of per country limitations)
4) The argument that H1B workers undercut American wages would have no merit. This 3% hike will cause H1B workers to negotiate for more salary to offset this hike - employers will only pay them this higher salary if they desperately need the worker. Thus, this system will truly hire "those skills that are in demand", as opposed to hiring cut-rate foreign labour that flocks to the bodyshops.
Cons:
1) Deliberate slow processing of applications by USCIS to extract as much of this tax as possible (although this would cause moral outrage and cause people to move back to their countries, especially citizens of other Developed countries who will not put up with that kind of immoral $hit)
2) Processing overhead for IRS - now they have to collect information on who is an H1B worker and who isn't.
What do you guys think? Let us propose this first to Congresswoman Zoe Lefgren...
You are an utopia writer. Aren't you?
1) Remove per country quotas on EB immigration
2) Increase the current 140,000 limit on EB green cards
I'd like it if the Core Leadership team of IV looked at this proposal and considered it as a tool towards achieving our other platform issues.
1) There are about 500K individuals on probationary status, with an average salary of $75K and a total of $37.5B.
2) Tax these individuals an extra 3% to the income tax and let those funds be solely reserved for a public insurance health program for underinsured American citizens (a la the Obama Health plan). 3% of $37.5B is still a sizable $1.125B, considering that Obama's Health plan calls for investing $10B.
3) Even after receiving the Green Card, this tax applies, until the person obtains US citizenship.
4) In exchange for 3% extra of our earnings, US lawmakers must abolish per country caps, as well as increase the 140K quota to 300K.
Pros:
1) Americans view everything and everyone as a business. As soon as they see that this proposal benefits them, they will be more amenable to legal immigration
2) This is the best bet for removing per country quotas - when you show them the dollar value of doing so - individuals from India and China who get their GCs can soon move onto bigger and better paying jobs, and pay more of this 3% tax
3) Green card backlogs will tremendously reduce (since most of it was created because of per country limitations)
4) The argument that H1B workers undercut American wages would have no merit. This 3% hike will cause H1B workers to negotiate for more salary to offset this hike - employers will only pay them this higher salary if they desperately need the worker. Thus, this system will truly hire "those skills that are in demand", as opposed to hiring cut-rate foreign labour that flocks to the bodyshops.
Cons:
1) Deliberate slow processing of applications by USCIS to extract as much of this tax as possible (although this would cause moral outrage and cause people to move back to their countries, especially citizens of other Developed countries who will not put up with that kind of immoral $hit)
2) Processing overhead for IRS - now they have to collect information on who is an H1B worker and who isn't.
What do you guys think? Let us propose this first to Congresswoman Zoe Lefgren...
You are an utopia writer. Aren't you?
more...
pictures rihanna cd 2011. rihanna loud deluxe edition; rihanna loud deluxe edition
coopheal
12-31 11:30 AM
I admire your persistance. It helped me to upgrade my monthly subscription to $50/month. Hope that we get our provisions in 2009.
Thanks. Please include your contribution in the signature.
Thanks. Please include your contribution in the signature.
dresses Rihanna#39;s Loud album which
gccovet
07-16 12:18 PM
Hi
I had asked in my last thread, if someone could help me understand what happens on the PD becomes current and the 485 is pending?
Will i be assigned visa no., come August 1? or that shall happen only when my 485 is approved?
thanks
Here's what will happen,
Say there are 1000 VISA's available, and there are 1100 I-485 with PD current, depending on PD, those 1000 VISA's will be allocated, rest 100 will wait.
Now, once VISA # is allocated, even if the category become 'U', it will not effect those I-485s.
At this point, you don't have to do anything, just keep an eye /check with your lawyer if there is any RFE and respond immediately.
HTH
Regards
GCCovet
I had asked in my last thread, if someone could help me understand what happens on the PD becomes current and the 485 is pending?
Will i be assigned visa no., come August 1? or that shall happen only when my 485 is approved?
thanks
Here's what will happen,
Say there are 1000 VISA's available, and there are 1100 I-485 with PD current, depending on PD, those 1000 VISA's will be allocated, rest 100 will wait.
Now, once VISA # is allocated, even if the category become 'U', it will not effect those I-485s.
At this point, you don't have to do anything, just keep an eye /check with your lawyer if there is any RFE and respond immediately.
HTH
Regards
GCCovet
more...
makeup rihanna cd 2011. download cd Saw rihanna; download cd Saw rihanna. Moyank24
sanju
02-16 11:58 PM
Tell the employer that you will file this form
http://www.dol.gov/esa/whd/forms/fts_wh4.htm
USCIS/DOL is cracking down on H1B employers nowadays. They will be worried.
In my friend's case, his employer was withholding the last paycheck and when called wasn't picking up the phone. Then he sent this link and immediately they called back and promised to pay back the wages
That's a good idea!
.
http://www.dol.gov/esa/whd/forms/fts_wh4.htm
USCIS/DOL is cracking down on H1B employers nowadays. They will be worried.
In my friend's case, his employer was withholding the last paycheck and when called wasn't picking up the phone. Then he sent this link and immediately they called back and promised to pay back the wages
That's a good idea!
.
girlfriend rihanna cd 2011. Rihanna at a #39;Good Girl Gone
indianabacklog
07-26 09:54 AM
On the ad and labor certificate, it is the same thing: master or bachelor plus 2 years' experience. But it is not indicated on the labor certificate this is an EB2 or EB3. Only on the I-140, the lawyer selected Eb2.
I called the lawyer, she was very stubborn, refused to make any change. But I am worried, if this application is denied after 8/17, then we will lose the chance to file I-485. My H1 is going to expire and reach the maximum.
Much will depend on what qualifications you have, what are they?
I called the lawyer, she was very stubborn, refused to make any change. But I am worried, if this application is denied after 8/17, then we will lose the chance to file I-485. My H1 is going to expire and reach the maximum.
Much will depend on what qualifications you have, what are they?
hairstyles rihanna cd 2011. is this Rihanna#39;s official
neoklaus
02-03 09:23 AM
I have a tax-based proposal in order to:
1) Remove per country quotas on EB immigration
2) Increase the current 140,000 limit on EB green cards
I'd like it if the Core Leadership team of IV looked at this proposal and considered it as a tool towards achieving our other platform issues.
1) There are about 500K individuals on probationary status, with an average salary of $75K and a total of $37.5B.
2) Tax these individuals an extra 3% to the income tax and let those funds be solely reserved for a public insurance health program for underinsured American citizens (a la the Obama Health plan). 3% of $37.5B is still a sizable $1.125B, considering that Obama's Health plan calls for investing $10B.
3) Even after receiving the Green Card, this tax applies, until the person obtains US citizenship.
4) In exchange for 3% extra of our earnings, US lawmakers must abolish per country caps, as well as increase the 140K quota to 300K.
Pros:
1) Americans view everything and everyone as a business. As soon as they see that this proposal benefits them, they will be more amenable to legal immigration
2) This is the best bet for removing per country quotas - when you show them the dollar value of doing so - individuals from India and China who get their GCs can soon move onto bigger and better paying jobs, and pay more of this 3% tax
3) Green card backlogs will tremendously reduce (since most of it was created because of per country limitations)
4) The argument that H1B workers undercut American wages would have no merit. This 3% hike will cause H1B workers to negotiate for more salary to offset this hike - employers will only pay them this higher salary if they desperately need the worker. Thus, this system will truly hire "those skills that are in demand", as opposed to hiring cut-rate foreign labour that flocks to the bodyshops.
Cons:
1) Deliberate slow processing of applications by USCIS to extract as much of this tax as possible (although this would cause moral outrage and cause people to move back to their countries, especially citizens of other Developed countries who will not put up with that kind of immoral $hit)
2) Processing overhead for IRS - now they have to collect information on who is an H1B worker and who isn't.
What do you guys think? Let us propose this first to Congresswoman Zoe Lefgren...
You are an utopia writer. Aren't you?
1) Remove per country quotas on EB immigration
2) Increase the current 140,000 limit on EB green cards
I'd like it if the Core Leadership team of IV looked at this proposal and considered it as a tool towards achieving our other platform issues.
1) There are about 500K individuals on probationary status, with an average salary of $75K and a total of $37.5B.
2) Tax these individuals an extra 3% to the income tax and let those funds be solely reserved for a public insurance health program for underinsured American citizens (a la the Obama Health plan). 3% of $37.5B is still a sizable $1.125B, considering that Obama's Health plan calls for investing $10B.
3) Even after receiving the Green Card, this tax applies, until the person obtains US citizenship.
4) In exchange for 3% extra of our earnings, US lawmakers must abolish per country caps, as well as increase the 140K quota to 300K.
Pros:
1) Americans view everything and everyone as a business. As soon as they see that this proposal benefits them, they will be more amenable to legal immigration
2) This is the best bet for removing per country quotas - when you show them the dollar value of doing so - individuals from India and China who get their GCs can soon move onto bigger and better paying jobs, and pay more of this 3% tax
3) Green card backlogs will tremendously reduce (since most of it was created because of per country limitations)
4) The argument that H1B workers undercut American wages would have no merit. This 3% hike will cause H1B workers to negotiate for more salary to offset this hike - employers will only pay them this higher salary if they desperately need the worker. Thus, this system will truly hire "those skills that are in demand", as opposed to hiring cut-rate foreign labour that flocks to the bodyshops.
Cons:
1) Deliberate slow processing of applications by USCIS to extract as much of this tax as possible (although this would cause moral outrage and cause people to move back to their countries, especially citizens of other Developed countries who will not put up with that kind of immoral $hit)
2) Processing overhead for IRS - now they have to collect information on who is an H1B worker and who isn't.
What do you guys think? Let us propose this first to Congresswoman Zoe Lefgren...
You are an utopia writer. Aren't you?
sunny1000
01-16 09:51 PM
I am on an H1 here and both me and my wife have Indian citizenship.
We are now looking to get an OCI for our 5 months old son (US Citizen)..but strangely saw this on the Indian consulate website... CGI SF Contents (http://www.cgisf.org/contents/view/47)
Q 6: Are minor children whose both parents are Indian citizens eligible for OCI?
Ans : No.
So did something change in the last 5 years or so ?
Our elder kid was born here in 2005 and we got her an OCI for her when she was 1 or so..
Thanks in Advance !!
They changed the rule a few months after the OCI was introduced, that one parent need have the foreign nationality to get OCI for the kid.
Now, they have announced that OCI and PIO will be merged. So, talk to the SFO consulate to find out the latest rules.
We are now looking to get an OCI for our 5 months old son (US Citizen)..but strangely saw this on the Indian consulate website... CGI SF Contents (http://www.cgisf.org/contents/view/47)
Q 6: Are minor children whose both parents are Indian citizens eligible for OCI?
Ans : No.
So did something change in the last 5 years or so ?
Our elder kid was born here in 2005 and we got her an OCI for her when she was 1 or so..
Thanks in Advance !!
They changed the rule a few months after the OCI was introduced, that one parent need have the foreign nationality to get OCI for the kid.
Now, they have announced that OCI and PIO will be merged. So, talk to the SFO consulate to find out the latest rules.
masala dosa
03-22 06:52 PM
Hello from Sue in the Disney area of Florida
IV has my story already.
Let me know if I can help and I will do my best to support you
Count me in - Orlando ( near University)
IV has my story already.
Let me know if I can help and I will do my best to support you
Count me in - Orlando ( near University)
