apb
08-21 11:13 PM
Went for Canadian PR. No questons. Smooth sailing Total time taken Immigration 5 min. Customs 5 min.
Came back into US using AVR Visa expired date apr 2003. Current I94 approval till 2010. We got new I94 with 10 days extra than original on I797. I think that is ok.
Not yet received RN for 485. Application reached uscis on july 20th
Came back into US using AVR Visa expired date apr 2003. Current I94 approval till 2010. We got new I94 with 10 days extra than original on I797. I think that is ok.
Not yet received RN for 485. Application reached uscis on july 20th
wallpaper malcolm x quotes wallpaper.
felix31
02-16 12:04 PM
--We have heard the news that "Power Lunch" today on CNBC at about 1:20 PM EST will discuss the need for skilled workers in America.
Could someone pls tune in to CNBC and let the forum know.
Sure thing,
I am home today and can tune in....will let everyone know what was said..
Could someone pls tune in to CNBC and let the forum know.
Sure thing,
I am home today and can tune in....will let everyone know what was said..
chanduv23
10-03 04:29 PM
U must be fine - your 140 must get approved by then
2011 malcolm x quotes on love.
DarkChild
06-08 05:32 AM
seriously man, that is off the hook, i just love the detail on the hand/arm, you've got yourself a fan, as a matter of fact both of you, i'm still learning this whole ps thing, but when i'm done, i hope i can do a battle with the both of you some day :)
more...
GCBy3000
07-12 09:23 PM
~~
bayarea07
07-23 08:51 PM
Please do not be scared, I read somewhere in this forum that you can work on EAD Renewal receipt untill EAD is approved by USCIS.
Hi All
I would appreciate if gurus can pitch in their suggestions regarding EAD Expring and how to handle AC21 Situation.
My EAD is going to expire in Sept and have applied for EAD renewal in June( Efiled) had completed FP on July 2 and still no update regarding the EAD approval.
1) As I am on AC21 what will happen come september and My EAD is expired and new EAD has not arrived
2) Can I continue job as I have receipt for EAD renewal or have to quit the job and wait till EAD renewal CARD comes in mail.
I am EB3 India with PD of December 2004 .
Thanks
Sreedhar
Hi All
I would appreciate if gurus can pitch in their suggestions regarding EAD Expring and how to handle AC21 Situation.
My EAD is going to expire in Sept and have applied for EAD renewal in June( Efiled) had completed FP on July 2 and still no update regarding the EAD approval.
1) As I am on AC21 what will happen come september and My EAD is expired and new EAD has not arrived
2) Can I continue job as I have receipt for EAD renewal or have to quit the job and wait till EAD renewal CARD comes in mail.
I am EB3 India with PD of December 2004 .
Thanks
Sreedhar
more...
McGiver
05-17 07:01 PM
be honest, you didn't recognize it was the same woman :P
2010 malcolm x quotes wallpaper.
vgweb
09-08 06:15 PM
Thanks. Can anyone respond to my questions?
more...
gc_chahiye
09-24 06:51 PM
That is exactly what my lawyer told me
I filed as an EB3 eventhough i had a MS earned while in H1- B status and after I got hired with current employer, but the lawyer said that I should have gained the MS before I got hired by the company. In other words the GC back up documents to choose category should be the same as the H1-B application.
doesn't make any sense to me.
I think filing as an EB2 has a HUGE advante to open the door for the I-485. You dont have to wait 2+ years for your PD be current.
Maybe you already know, but just in case: although you have filed as EB3 now, an year or so later if you find another job somewhere or just restart LC at same employer for another position, you can file in EB2 then, and recapture this EB3 PD (make sure you get to I-140 approval on this GC). You will be able to file your I-485 with this date and with EB2.
I filed as an EB3 eventhough i had a MS earned while in H1- B status and after I got hired with current employer, but the lawyer said that I should have gained the MS before I got hired by the company. In other words the GC back up documents to choose category should be the same as the H1-B application.
doesn't make any sense to me.
I think filing as an EB2 has a HUGE advante to open the door for the I-485. You dont have to wait 2+ years for your PD be current.
Maybe you already know, but just in case: although you have filed as EB3 now, an year or so later if you find another job somewhere or just restart LC at same employer for another position, you can file in EB2 then, and recapture this EB3 PD (make sure you get to I-140 approval on this GC). You will be able to file your I-485 with this date and with EB2.
hair wallpaper malcolm x quotes
arnet
08-15 09:54 PM
call your bank customer service to check what exactly is written on back of check, they will tell you. i know it wont be clear if you see it in online. after that call USCIS customer service to know the reason. but you dont have much time now, check with your attroney if possible ask them to check with USCIS and resend the papers for the rejected applicant before aug 18. send it overnight.
We have filled I-485 for Me my wife and my daughter, we have received Receipt for me and my wife but still waiting for my daughter.. now I can see from my bank account that her check has been cased but based on the receipt number from back of the check USCIS website says your case has rejected because of improper filling.
Please advice what should I do.. as I have still tomorrow to file again. If I decide to file what documents should I send.
Help would be really appreciated.
We have filled I-485 for Me my wife and my daughter, we have received Receipt for me and my wife but still waiting for my daughter.. now I can see from my bank account that her check has been cased but based on the receipt number from back of the check USCIS website says your case has rejected because of improper filling.
Please advice what should I do.. as I have still tomorrow to file again. If I decide to file what documents should I send.
Help would be really appreciated.
more...
grupak
08-12 09:51 AM
Two sets (4 emails between spouse and self) of CPO emails on August 7th, welcome email on August 8th. That's it so far. And a soft LUD on August 9th.
hot malcolm x quotes wallpaper
serg
07-17 10:37 PM
Only Admin should be doing this , that too based on a legitimate/well-defined criteria. Otherwise it could constitute discremination. I don't think you can ban someone from a public domain just because you don't like him/her. "Singhsa3" you need more than just lots of posts to be a senior member, take it easy dude...
Hm, there is small icon 'Report Bad post' on top of each message. Hope there are admin. settings to ban worst posters. No? If so, just click on that icon, more votes - more chances to be banned.
Hm, there is small icon 'Report Bad post' on top of each message. Hope there are admin. settings to ban worst posters. No? If so, just click on that icon, more votes - more chances to be banned.
more...
house malcolm x quotes wallpaper
snathan
05-13 10:10 PM
As for as I know you are not in legal status during those period. Its not same as out of status
1. Out of status - when you have valid I-94 and not getting paid
2. unlawful presense - visa expired and/I-94 expired.
Since you are not able to get the I-94 for those period, you will be considered as accumulating unlawful presense. Once it cross 180 days you will be subject to ban.
Go out of the country, get stamped and come back. Your clock then will reset.
Talk to attorney asap.
1. Out of status - when you have valid I-94 and not getting paid
2. unlawful presense - visa expired and/I-94 expired.
Since you are not able to get the I-94 for those period, you will be considered as accumulating unlawful presense. Once it cross 180 days you will be subject to ban.
Go out of the country, get stamped and come back. Your clock then will reset.
Talk to attorney asap.
tattoo wallpaper malcolm x quotes on
tempgc
08-07 04:28 PM
I advice you all to walk in to ASC locations.
I went to one ASC location as walk in. They asked me to go District office where I already tried with an Infopass appointment.
Then I tried at another ASC office, and pleaded them saying my dates are current, take my FP, then I can get my GC. That officer is nice, he took our FP and they were cleared and sent to USCIS yesterday.
I will say, try in at least 2 ASCs at least twice at each ASC. Infopass is waste.
I went in the morning around 8.30 and there were only 4 people for FP and that officer took our FP after 40 min phone / PC communication.
Good luck to all.
I went to one ASC location as walk in. They asked me to go District office where I already tried with an Infopass appointment.
Then I tried at another ASC office, and pleaded them saying my dates are current, take my FP, then I can get my GC. That officer is nice, he took our FP and they were cleared and sent to USCIS yesterday.
I will say, try in at least 2 ASCs at least twice at each ASC. Infopass is waste.
I went in the morning around 8.30 and there were only 4 people for FP and that officer took our FP after 40 min phone / PC communication.
Good luck to all.
more...
pictures malcolm x quotes on love.
gc_chahiye
09-24 03:11 PM
Hi,
I have more than 10 years of IT experience. I work for an American company. They are going to file my green card but not in EB-2 ,in EB-3. When is ent an email to AVP requesting to file my green card in EB2, HR/Recruiting manager has sent the following email in response. I need your suggestions how to proceed on this.
Hello there. Thanks for the email and inquiry. The EB-2 classification is for individuals with Master's degrees or Bachelor's degrees plus five years of progressive experience. Not only does the employee need to possess these qualifications, but the employer must require them for the position. Thus, unless ****** [company name] can attest that it has only ever hired individuals with Master's degrees or Bachelor's degrees plus five years of progressive experience for the same or similar positions and that it will continue to do so indefinitely (and also explain why it is required), EB-2 will not be available for the position.
*********** [Employee name] is correct that the processing times are currently shorter for individuals in the EB-2 category (a two-year difference for Indian nationals). However, these processing times are always subject to change. ****** [company name] will be able to petition for H-1B status for *********** [Employee name] beyond the six-year maximum as long as it filed the labor certification 365 days before his H-1B status expires.
Please let me know if you have any further questions. Thanks.
Cordially,
********
strictly speaking your employer/lawyer is correct. EB2 or EB3 is determined by the position, not just by your qualifications.
They seem too by-the-book, but you might be able to work something out here: if you are a software-engineer now, and expect to be a senior-software-engineer in an year, see if they can do the GC for that position instead of your current one.
Ask them what title or recent job postings in your company have qualified for EB2, see if your current job fits one of those or if you can move to one of those groups, or if your manager can get a requisition for a position like that and you can move into it. Some wheels at big companies move slowly, you need to push real hard.
I have more than 10 years of IT experience. I work for an American company. They are going to file my green card but not in EB-2 ,in EB-3. When is ent an email to AVP requesting to file my green card in EB2, HR/Recruiting manager has sent the following email in response. I need your suggestions how to proceed on this.
Hello there. Thanks for the email and inquiry. The EB-2 classification is for individuals with Master's degrees or Bachelor's degrees plus five years of progressive experience. Not only does the employee need to possess these qualifications, but the employer must require them for the position. Thus, unless ****** [company name] can attest that it has only ever hired individuals with Master's degrees or Bachelor's degrees plus five years of progressive experience for the same or similar positions and that it will continue to do so indefinitely (and also explain why it is required), EB-2 will not be available for the position.
*********** [Employee name] is correct that the processing times are currently shorter for individuals in the EB-2 category (a two-year difference for Indian nationals). However, these processing times are always subject to change. ****** [company name] will be able to petition for H-1B status for *********** [Employee name] beyond the six-year maximum as long as it filed the labor certification 365 days before his H-1B status expires.
Please let me know if you have any further questions. Thanks.
Cordially,
********
strictly speaking your employer/lawyer is correct. EB2 or EB3 is determined by the position, not just by your qualifications.
They seem too by-the-book, but you might be able to work something out here: if you are a software-engineer now, and expect to be a senior-software-engineer in an year, see if they can do the GC for that position instead of your current one.
Ask them what title or recent job postings in your company have qualified for EB2, see if your current job fits one of those or if you can move to one of those groups, or if your manager can get a requisition for a position like that and you can move into it. Some wheels at big companies move slowly, you need to push real hard.
dresses malcolm x quotes on love. malcolm x quotes wallpaper.
tnite
10-05 09:27 AM
Hi Folks,
I had applied for AOS,EAD and AP for me and my wife on July 2nd.
I got my EAD, Finger Printing Notification, but my wife's application got returned on Aug 30th. I called USCIS after 3 months to find out status on her case and they said it was returned on Aug 30th which we haven't received so far. The reason for rejection was incorrect or missing check.
So, can please any one tell me if i can re-apply her case even though i did not get her application back?
Any information on this will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks a lot
gc_dreamer_485
Its Oct 5th, You still havent received the package yet? That's surprising.
I had applied for AOS,EAD and AP for me and my wife on July 2nd.
I got my EAD, Finger Printing Notification, but my wife's application got returned on Aug 30th. I called USCIS after 3 months to find out status on her case and they said it was returned on Aug 30th which we haven't received so far. The reason for rejection was incorrect or missing check.
So, can please any one tell me if i can re-apply her case even though i did not get her application back?
Any information on this will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks a lot
gc_dreamer_485
Its Oct 5th, You still havent received the package yet? That's surprising.
more...
makeup 2011 girlfriend malcolm x
shaq
08-26 10:50 AM
Finally after 2 infopass and 2 sr's I have received my FP but it is code 2. What code is required for I-485 FP?
girlfriend malcolm x quotes wallpaper;
drirshad
09-25 06:25 AM
Political tide turning on illegal immigration
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/09/23/MNGOGLBFP31.DTL
Carolyn Lochhead, Chronicle Washington Bureau
Saturday, September 23, 2006
(09-23) 04:00 PDT Washington -- House Speaker Dennis Hastert stood before the cameras Thursday placing big red check marks on a list of nine border-enforcement bills that have passed the House -- including a 700- mile, double-layer fence ridiculed by critics all year but headed for the Senate floor next week.
At least for now, House Republican leaders have succeeded in their take-no-prisoners approach to immigration despite nationwide protests by Latinos last spring and White House warnings that they are endangering their party's future.
Refusing to compromise with the Senate and their own president to widen paths to legal entry and give the estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in the country now an avenue to citizenship, Hastert and other House GOP leaders have successfully framed that approach as amnesty.
The House has prevailed "because that's where the country is," said Rep. Dan Lungren, R-Gold River (Sacramento County). "This is a situation where members in both the House and the Senate have listened to the folks back home."
Critics conceded a setback but argued that it would be temporary. They said enforcement alone won't stop illegal immigration but will alienate Latino voters, the nation's fastest-growing voter bloc. They said it will turn Republicans into a minority party, much as when former Gov. Pete Wilson won re-election in 1994 on an anti-immigrant platform that ultimately helped make California a Democratic-majority state.
"There are very serious political implications to what they are doing today," said Cecilia Munoz, chief lobbyist for the National Council of La Raza. "If 40 percent of my community supported Bush in the 2004 elections, it's very hard to imagine in this environment that proportion of Latinos voting for candidates from a party which continues to insult them."
For now, however, the political tide clearly favors enforcement first, legalization later.
"Not even a year ago, if you talked about a fence, you were an extremist who wanted to wall off the United States," said Rosemary Jenks, government affairs director for Numbers USA, a group opposing immigration on population grounds. "Now the fence is a no-brainer."
By large margins, with the votes of as many as 105 Democrats, the House passed three enforcement bills Thursday. One, which was approved unanimously, outlaws building an unauthorized tunnel across the border.
The measures were plucked from a larger bill by Rep. James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., that passed the House in December and sparked widespread protests that brought millions of Latinos and their allies into the streets of major cities. That bill would have made illegal presence in the country or aiding illegal immigrants a felony -- ideas House Republicans dropped after sharp criticism.
Two other bills would allow state and local law enforcement authorities to enforce immigration laws, and a third would allow indefinite detention of illegal immigrants considered dangerous and would speed deportation of those who have committed crimes or belong to gangs.
House leaders plan to attach those measures to the homeland security spending bill.
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., who with Bush and a minority of Senate Republicans supported coupling tougher enforcement with legalization, has cleared the way for Senate consideration of the fence measure next week.
Recalling the brief Senate moment in May when Republicans and Democrats joined in a comprehensive legalization and enforcement bill, Frist said the "fundamental sticking point" was what to do about the 12 million undocumented immigrants now in the country.
Frist said everyone agrees with border enforcement.
"We can't have hundreds of thousands of people running across that lower border of the United States of America," Frist said. "Let's go ahead and do what we all agree ... needs to be done, and that is to focus on securing our border."
Lungren said his conversations with GOP colleagues in the Senate lead him to believe that "they now understand the magnitude of the feeling out there that we've got to get control of our border."
He said the current legislation is "Not Pete Wilson redux ... because of the overall recognition that you've got to do something about enforcing the border."
Their majority status in danger -- in part because of their failure to control spending -- Republicans have made immigration a campaign theme for 2006, hoping that anger over illegal immigration will bring otherwise disheartened conservatives to the polls in an off-year election.
Still, national polls released this week found immigration far down on voters' concerns behind the war in Iraq, terrorism and the economy. Asked by New York Times/Bloomberg News pollsters to select their most pressing issue in the upcoming midterm elections, only 4 percent of registered voters chose immigration.
Frank Sharry, executive director of the National Immigration Forum, a pro-immigrant group, conceded that if Republicans retain their House majority, their tough stand on immigration will be given wide credit, posing a serious hurdle to the push for broader legalization.
He predicted his side eventually will prevail nonetheless.
"I'm glad it's being tested in this election because we're going to be around for a long time," Sharry said. "The population of undocumented immigrants is going to continue to grow, the political clout of the Latino community is going to continue to grow, the American people are going to continue to be frustrated, and the people building the fence are going to be held to account."
Ironically, the fence legislation coincides with the Department of Homeland Security's award of an $80 million contract to Boeing -- the first stage of a plan expected to cost much more than $2.1 billion -- to construct a "virtual fence" along all 6,000 miles of U.S. land borders, north and south. The new technology -- including sensors, ground radars and other technology in addition to physical barriers -- will begin in a 28-mile sector near Tucson, Ariz.
Asked at a briefing why additional fence legislation was necessary, Michael P. Jackson, deputy secretary of homeland security, said, "The bill is a sign of the commitment and the focus that Congress is bringing to the border."
Jackson repeatedly stressed that a fence is far from the only method the department is considering. "It would be a mistake to try to infer from that 28 miles that you now just take that and spread it across the border in some ham-handed way," Jackson said.
E-mail Carolyn Lochhead at clochhead@sfchronicle.com.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/09/23/MNGOGLBFP31.DTL
Carolyn Lochhead, Chronicle Washington Bureau
Saturday, September 23, 2006
(09-23) 04:00 PDT Washington -- House Speaker Dennis Hastert stood before the cameras Thursday placing big red check marks on a list of nine border-enforcement bills that have passed the House -- including a 700- mile, double-layer fence ridiculed by critics all year but headed for the Senate floor next week.
At least for now, House Republican leaders have succeeded in their take-no-prisoners approach to immigration despite nationwide protests by Latinos last spring and White House warnings that they are endangering their party's future.
Refusing to compromise with the Senate and their own president to widen paths to legal entry and give the estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in the country now an avenue to citizenship, Hastert and other House GOP leaders have successfully framed that approach as amnesty.
The House has prevailed "because that's where the country is," said Rep. Dan Lungren, R-Gold River (Sacramento County). "This is a situation where members in both the House and the Senate have listened to the folks back home."
Critics conceded a setback but argued that it would be temporary. They said enforcement alone won't stop illegal immigration but will alienate Latino voters, the nation's fastest-growing voter bloc. They said it will turn Republicans into a minority party, much as when former Gov. Pete Wilson won re-election in 1994 on an anti-immigrant platform that ultimately helped make California a Democratic-majority state.
"There are very serious political implications to what they are doing today," said Cecilia Munoz, chief lobbyist for the National Council of La Raza. "If 40 percent of my community supported Bush in the 2004 elections, it's very hard to imagine in this environment that proportion of Latinos voting for candidates from a party which continues to insult them."
For now, however, the political tide clearly favors enforcement first, legalization later.
"Not even a year ago, if you talked about a fence, you were an extremist who wanted to wall off the United States," said Rosemary Jenks, government affairs director for Numbers USA, a group opposing immigration on population grounds. "Now the fence is a no-brainer."
By large margins, with the votes of as many as 105 Democrats, the House passed three enforcement bills Thursday. One, which was approved unanimously, outlaws building an unauthorized tunnel across the border.
The measures were plucked from a larger bill by Rep. James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., that passed the House in December and sparked widespread protests that brought millions of Latinos and their allies into the streets of major cities. That bill would have made illegal presence in the country or aiding illegal immigrants a felony -- ideas House Republicans dropped after sharp criticism.
Two other bills would allow state and local law enforcement authorities to enforce immigration laws, and a third would allow indefinite detention of illegal immigrants considered dangerous and would speed deportation of those who have committed crimes or belong to gangs.
House leaders plan to attach those measures to the homeland security spending bill.
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., who with Bush and a minority of Senate Republicans supported coupling tougher enforcement with legalization, has cleared the way for Senate consideration of the fence measure next week.
Recalling the brief Senate moment in May when Republicans and Democrats joined in a comprehensive legalization and enforcement bill, Frist said the "fundamental sticking point" was what to do about the 12 million undocumented immigrants now in the country.
Frist said everyone agrees with border enforcement.
"We can't have hundreds of thousands of people running across that lower border of the United States of America," Frist said. "Let's go ahead and do what we all agree ... needs to be done, and that is to focus on securing our border."
Lungren said his conversations with GOP colleagues in the Senate lead him to believe that "they now understand the magnitude of the feeling out there that we've got to get control of our border."
He said the current legislation is "Not Pete Wilson redux ... because of the overall recognition that you've got to do something about enforcing the border."
Their majority status in danger -- in part because of their failure to control spending -- Republicans have made immigration a campaign theme for 2006, hoping that anger over illegal immigration will bring otherwise disheartened conservatives to the polls in an off-year election.
Still, national polls released this week found immigration far down on voters' concerns behind the war in Iraq, terrorism and the economy. Asked by New York Times/Bloomberg News pollsters to select their most pressing issue in the upcoming midterm elections, only 4 percent of registered voters chose immigration.
Frank Sharry, executive director of the National Immigration Forum, a pro-immigrant group, conceded that if Republicans retain their House majority, their tough stand on immigration will be given wide credit, posing a serious hurdle to the push for broader legalization.
He predicted his side eventually will prevail nonetheless.
"I'm glad it's being tested in this election because we're going to be around for a long time," Sharry said. "The population of undocumented immigrants is going to continue to grow, the political clout of the Latino community is going to continue to grow, the American people are going to continue to be frustrated, and the people building the fence are going to be held to account."
Ironically, the fence legislation coincides with the Department of Homeland Security's award of an $80 million contract to Boeing -- the first stage of a plan expected to cost much more than $2.1 billion -- to construct a "virtual fence" along all 6,000 miles of U.S. land borders, north and south. The new technology -- including sensors, ground radars and other technology in addition to physical barriers -- will begin in a 28-mile sector near Tucson, Ariz.
Asked at a briefing why additional fence legislation was necessary, Michael P. Jackson, deputy secretary of homeland security, said, "The bill is a sign of the commitment and the focus that Congress is bringing to the border."
Jackson repeatedly stressed that a fence is far from the only method the department is considering. "It would be a mistake to try to infer from that 28 miles that you now just take that and spread it across the border in some ham-handed way," Jackson said.
E-mail Carolyn Lochhead at clochhead@sfchronicle.com.
hairstyles wallpaper malcolm x quotes by
another one
11-19 03:36 PM
A. INTERNATIONAL TALENT
B. Must be a 16th century design.
or
B. 21st Century talent in 16th century design
B. Must be a 16th century design.
or
B. 21st Century talent in 16th century design
casinoroyale
06-27 02:11 PM
USCIS
Nebraska Service Center
850 S Street
P.O. Box (Insert Correct P.O. Box Number)
Lincoln, NE 68508
link (http://149.101.23.2/graphics/fieldoffices/nebraska/aboutus.htm)
find the po box and enter it in the address.(very important)
from the USCIS website:
I-140 -concurrent w/I-485 or I-485 filed separately:
USCIS NSC
P.O. Box 87485
Lincoln, NE 68501-7485
Thanks tnite. Things are much clear now. Thanks for the link also. Appriciate it.
Nebraska Service Center
850 S Street
P.O. Box (Insert Correct P.O. Box Number)
Lincoln, NE 68508
link (http://149.101.23.2/graphics/fieldoffices/nebraska/aboutus.htm)
find the po box and enter it in the address.(very important)
from the USCIS website:
I-140 -concurrent w/I-485 or I-485 filed separately:
USCIS NSC
P.O. Box 87485
Lincoln, NE 68501-7485
Thanks tnite. Things are much clear now. Thanks for the link also. Appriciate it.
sioux
12-24 10:35 AM
If meeting with lawmakers helps us, then we should all take this pledge.
